Last week, our forum discussions were rich with practical insights and debates. Members focused on the nuances of geochemical data in resource modeling and shared experiences with the challenges of soil anomalies in gold exploration. There was also a lively exchange about the efficacy of continuing education courses for professional development hours, and some technical discussions about using portable NMR devices in tight sands.
This Week’s Hot Topics
Leveling up geochem for resource models
A deep dive into how geochemical data can enhance resource models sparked discussion on best practices and innovative approaches.
Read more here
Rock that floats, no tricks
This thread explored the fascinating phenomenon of rocks that float, with a focus on pumice and its geological significance.
Read more here
Which PDH courses actually pay off
Professionals debated which continuing education courses truly add value to a geologist’s career, providing practical advice on selection.
Read more here
Portable NMR on tight sands — useful or noise
A technical discussion questioned the reliability of portable NMR devices in assessing tight sands, weighing benefits against potential drawbacks.
Read more here
PESTPP-IES tips for sustainable yield targets
Experts shared insights on using PESTPP-IES to set realistic and sustainable yield targets, with a focus on groundwater management.
Read more here
Soil anomalies, disappointing gold grades
Explorers exchanged stories of unexpected soil anomalies affecting gold grades, offering lessons learned and mitigation strategies.
Read more here
Geochem QA/QC and cutoff tools
This thread dissected the role of QA/QC in geochemical analysis and discussed tools that help in determining accurate cutoff grades.
Read more here
Carlsbad twinning on a roadside feldspar
A curious observation of Carlsbad twinning in feldspar prompted a conversation about its formation and identification in the field.
Read more here
From outcrop to Outlook calendar
Geologists shared tips on managing field data and integrating it into digital tools for better project management.
Read more here
Phase II scope creep with PFAS
Discussions revolved around the challenges of managing scope creep in Phase II environmental site assessments, especially with PFAS concerns.
Read more here
Thanks for staying engaged with our community. Looking forward to another week of insightful discussions and shared knowledge. Take care!